July 6, 2026

From Term Sheet to Drawdown: Navigating Bank Guardrails for Corporate Borrowers

For many corporate borrowers, signing a term sheet feels like the finish line. In reality, it is only the beginning for the lawyers. Between signing and drawdown lies a tightly controlled process governed by internal bank, legal, and regulatory guardrails that can stall—or even freeze—funding if not properly navigated.

The Execution Gap

While it is natural to celebrate the commercial agreement and assume the bank’s front office will handle the remaining logistics, the period between signing and funding requires rigorous management. A bank is highly motivated to deploy capital—but it operates within strict compliance and regulatory guardrails that cannot be bypassed. Borrowers focused purely on pricing and terms are often blindsided by the bank's internal processes.

Understanding these six key insights into bank-side processes will help smooth out the execution gap on your next deal, whether you are borrowing through an onshore Hong Kong entity or an offshore structure. In practice, most delays and drawdown failures can be traced back to the following recurring issues:

1. The Front Office Cannot Save You

The Front Office (your Relationship Manager) is your commercial contact point. They structure the deal and manage the relationship. However, the personnel who actually clear you for onboarding, release the funds, and monitor the loan throughout its lifecycle are the compliance, legal, and middle-office operations teams. These teams operate independently of the Front Office and must follow strict internal and regulatory guidelines. Every requirement must be satisfied before funds are released; the Front Office does not have the authority to waive them.

Strategic Action: Identify who controls the onboarding and drawdown mechanics before signing. Pre-empt the operations checklist early rather than assuming the Front Office can override internal compliance requirements.

‍

2. PDFs Are Not Evidence

During client onboarding, borrowers often assume that emailing PDF scans of corporate documents (registers, certificates of incorporation, passports) is sufficient. It is not. Bank compliance teams do not just need information; they require evidentiary certainty. Banks are heavily audited for KYC and AML compliance, so a scanned PDF is merely a preliminary record. Lenders ultimately require a “Certified True Copy” (CTC)—physically signed and stamped by a lawyer, CPA, or company secretary.

Strategic Action: Agree upfront on a definitive onboarding checklist, including specific certification standards, and deliver a complete, properly certified pack at the outset. Drip-feeding uncertified documents will inevitably delay drawdown.

‍

3. Corporate Governance: Directors Hold the Pen

Founders and sole shareholders often assume their signature alone is sufficient to authorise a loan, viewing themselves as the ultimate authority. Confusing these roles can render the authorisation invalid. While shareholders own the company, it is the Board of Directors that holds the power to manage the business and incur debt. Even if the shareholders and directors are the exact same individuals, they wear different legal hats. To bind a company to a credit facility, a bank requires properly convened Board Minutes or written resolutions from the directors—not shareholder resolutions.

Strategic Action: Ensure legal counsel drafts clean and precise corporate authorities. Always verify that it is the directors who are formally resolving to enter into the facility.

‍

4. Conditions Precedent Are Not Formalities

Many borrowers treat Conditions Precedent (CPs) as a mere administrative checklist to be ticked off right before drawdown. In practice, CPs are strict legal hurdles. Whether it is obtaining formal legal opinions, securing third-party consents, or clearing final KYC sign-offs, the bank’s legal counsel cannot release funds until every CP has been formally certified as satisfied (or explicitly waived in writing).

Strategic Action: Treat CP satisfaction as a critical path workstream from day one. Assign clear ownership for each item and establish direct lines of communication between your legal counsel and the bank’s lawyers to clear technical hurdles early.

‍

5. The 30-Day Trap (Perfection Deadlines)

Borrowers frequently treat post-closing deliverables—such as delivering original share certificates or paying stamp duty—as chores to be completed at their leisure. Lenders view them entirely differently. Banks operate on strict statutory deadlines for perfecting their security. For example, under the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622), there is a one-month (30-day) window to register a corporate charge at the Companies Registry.

Real-World Case: We have seen situations where a borrower completed a drawdown but delayed returning executed security documents. When the bank attempted to register the charge, the statutory window had already expired. This led to lengthy (and expensive) negotiations to remedy the situation.

Strategic Action: Build a strict 21-day internal calendar for all post-closing steps. While these filings are typically handled by the bank and its counsel, the borrower should proactively monitor progress. If a statutory filing is missed, your facility—not the bank’s process—is what suffers.

‍

6. The “Further Assurance” Lever

Almost every loan or facility agreement will have a “Further Assurance” clause. Most borrowers gloss over it, assuming it is standard boilerplate. However, bank legal teams actively use this clause as a lever to fix execution defects or address gaps discovered during post-closing audits. If a signature was missed, a registry rejected a filing due to a typographical error, or a newly formed subsidiary must join the facility under a "Guarantor Coverage" test, the bank will invoke Further Assurance to compel you to execute new documents.

Strategic Action: While the clause itself is standard market practice, ensure your legal counsel reviews it so that its scope is strictly limited to perfecting the specifically agreed security package. This prevents the clause from being misinterpreted as a mechanism for the lender to require additional security at a later stage.

‍

Conclusion

The period between signing and drawdown is where a lender secures its position—and tests a borrower’s operational readiness. Success in this phase is not about negotiating better terms, but about navigating internal bank guardrails with discipline and precision. Borrowers who treat execution as a structured process—rather than an administrative afterthought—are far more likely to achieve timely and frictionless drawdowns.

‍

How we can help

Our team includes experts with extensive prior experience sitting as bank-side legal counsel, overseeing complex cross-border secured lending transactions and standard guarantee facilities. We understand the internal machinery of lenders and are uniquely positioned to help corporate borrowers navigate the drawdown process smoothly.

We regularly support corporate borrowers by:

Preparing bank-ready corporate authority and document packs to accelerate AML/KYC onboarding.
‍Managing Conditions Precedent (CP) workstreams and coordinating directly with bank counsel to ensure timely drawdown.
‍Monitoring statutory perfection timelines and managing post-closing deliverables to prevent post-closing execution risk.

Our goal is simple: to ensure your facility is not just signed, but fully executable and drawdown ready. If you would like further information or assistance with an upcoming financing or refinancing transaction, please contact us to discuss how we can assist.

Insights & Publications

BULLETIN

meet the team

INSIGHTS & PUBLICATIONS